Poll: Most doubt Dems have plan for Iraq
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/ap_on_re_us/postelection_ap_poll

Get out, that's the plan. Just get OUT!

Stop pussyfooting around.

The blush is off the rose -- soon all the"virgins" will know what it means to get royally fucked.

The Coming Sellout: The Democrats won't deliver on the war

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=10017

Antiwar voters who thought they were ushering in a new era of sanity in the realm of U.S. foreign policy are very much mistaken: the election was a measure of voter aspirations. But the politicians are selling them out, and rather quickly. Usually they wait a while longer before breaking their campaign promises – to do it this early, and in so brazen a manner, betrays the real contempt our "leaders" have for voters and the party rank-and-file.

The Washington elite has managed to reinterpret the election results, widely seen as a referendum on the war, into a rationale for inaction

...

Establishment types aver that this election wasn't about Iraq, it was really about corruption – but the two are intimately connected. Aside from the moral corruption of a military occupation that tolerates Abu Ghraib and routinely covers up its crimes, don't forget the war profiteers, who are raking in multi-millions investing in Washington's fastest-growing industries: homeland security and democracy promotion, the latest adjuncts of the military-industrial complex. To utter the word "Halliburton" is to evoke the spirit of corruption itself – can it be that the Democrats, in the name of "bipartisanship" and "unity" in wartime, will pass on their promise to clean up Washington?